Skip to content
Council Discourse

NYC Council meetings, chaptered and linked by time.

Independent project. Not affiliated with the New York City Council.

Created by Uzair Qadir

Inspired by Vikram Oberoi's City Meetings

Q&A

CM on Fifth Avenue resurfacing and public realm funding

New York City Council · May 29, 2026 · starts 2:08:05 · 2 min 44 sec

An unknown council member asks about $453K for Fifth Avenue resurfacing and $6.4M for public realm programs. Officials explain resurfacing is ahead of capital project, and public realm funding is expanding open streets.

Unidentified speaker

Last set of questions.

Unidentified speaker

Oh, I think I see my former staff in the audience.

Unidentified speaker

Milo, how you doing?

Unidentified speaker

Nice to see you.

Unidentified speaker

I'm going to turn it to just a few questions.

Unidentified speaker

Resurfacing Fifth Avenue.

Unidentified speaker

The executive plan includes additional city funds of $453,000 in fiscal 2026 only to resurface Fifth Avenue.

Unidentified speaker

What will this funding be used for?

Unidentified speaker

Please be specific.

Unidentified speaker

So ahead of the capital project that's happening on Fifth Avenue, we wanted to make sure that the service has a good riding service ahead of FIFA and other events.

Unidentified speaker

So that is why there was specific funding added for expense resurfacing of Fifth Avenue.

Unidentified speaker

If it's just resurfacing, why isn't this capitally eligible?

Unidentified speaker

So resurfacing by itself is capital eligible, Chair, but because the capital project is coming up, we didn't want to mess with the capital eligibility of the larger Fifth Avenue project.

Unidentified speaker

If we paved it with capital funds, it would basically preclude us from coming back to do the capital streetscape project for a certain amount of time, and we didn't want to preclude it.

Unidentified speaker

Okay.

Unidentified speaker

Regarding public realm, $6.4 million in city funding was baseline starting in fiscal 27 for public realm programs.

Unidentified speaker

Will this funding just be used to support open streets at its current level, or will it be used to expand the program?

Unidentified speaker

Yes, so first we're very grateful that the funding was baseline, so we're not going year to year anymore and not knowing what's coming up.

Unidentified speaker

So that's a really important investment to us to be able to plan.

Unidentified speaker

And as the commissioner said earlier, we do see the program growing.

Unidentified speaker

It's bigger at this point this year than it was last year, and it's not constrained by the money.

Unidentified speaker

We've always been able to do whatever has been needed, even if we have to move some money around internally.

Unidentified speaker

So we're committed to growing the program, and not just from a money perspective, but providing

Unidentified speaker

programming where it's needed.

Unidentified speaker

We've been working a lot on process to make sure that partners get paid much faster.

Unidentified speaker

I think the money and the long-term planning enable us to be able to do much more in terms of working closely with those partners.

Unidentified speaker

So fair to say it is expanding?

Unidentified speaker

Yeah, we don't turn anyone away because of money.

Unidentified speaker

What other plaza programs will receive funding, if any?

Unidentified speaker

So we are committed to expanding our plaza program, and we have an applicant-based process for that every year.

Unidentified speaker

And as part of that, we have our plaza equity funds, or sorry, our public space equity funds, because it goes beyond plazas now.

Unidentified speaker

And so we want to make sure that whoever has an idea for a plaza, we can work with them, whether to test it short-term as an open street, whether to eventually build it out capitally, to provide ongoing maintenance support.

Unidentified speaker

This is something we're very committed to as an agency.