Andrew Rigie testifies on Intro 917 cleanliness standards and penalty concerns
Rigie acknowledges existing DOT rules already address cleanliness but asks that if penalties are codified, first-time violations allow a warning or cure period before monetary fines, consistent with broader small business reform efforts and Executive Order 11.
And can I get 30 seconds to finish up the last one?
Obviously, we all want to keep the streets, you know, clean, the outdoor dining clean.
We believe, as DOT acknowledged and was mentioned earlier, that the rules currently establish a regulatory framework and penalties if the
sidewalk or roadway cafe area is not kept clean.
We don't necessarily love doubling up the fine scheme.
However, that being said, if you are going to codify what's already in the rules, we would just ask that violations, or I should say first-time violations, allow for a warning or a cure period before a monetary penalty is issued.
The council I know is working on small business reforms.
The mayor's administration through executive order 11 is looking at reducing fines and fees.
And we believe as the hospitality lines, any small business violation that does not pose an immediate hazard to workers or to the public should allow a warning or cure period before a penalty is issued.
We think the focus should be on education training first, penalties as a last resort.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Vinny.