Menin says her own name produced a sexualized Grok image
Menin asks whether a user can get Grok to show a real person nude or sexualized; Castillo-Madrid repeats that Grok has strict controls; Menin says she and her team entered her name and got a sexualized image, calls the answer unacceptable, and Castillo-Madrid says no one should have such images made without consent.
So today, can a user get Grok, the Grok app, or Grok Imagine to show a real person nude in their underwear or in a sexualized pose?
Grog has strict controls in place to prevent the sexualization of children or real people.
Yeah, I'm going to completely push back on it.
I mean, just this more.
myself and my team, we put our own name, my own name into Grok, and there's absolutely like a sexualized image of myself.
So if it can happen to me, it can happen to any woman.
So I completely discount what you're saying that Grok has solved this problem.
I mean, it's completely unacceptable when these kind of sexualized images are readily available.
To be clear, no one should have sexualized images made of them without their consent.
And our policies prohibit that.
Any specific cases I can't speak of, but I will say, like I said before, we have a very bright line and a grok cannot be used to exploit minors, commit crimes, or generate illegal content.
So then how is it that within a second I could find a sexualized image of myself on using Grok?
Madam Speaker, I can't speak to that specific instance.
What I can say is that we do have strict controls, and I'm happy to get our safety team to look into that specific instance.