Flynn states DOT position on Intro 46 autism plaques
Flynn supports the intent of Intro 46 to protect vulnerable road users but cites the federal MUTCD and studies showing too many signs create clutter and do not change driver behavior. He also warns the autism warning plaque system would require substantial staffing and funding.
Turning to the legislation before the Council today.
First, Intro 46, sponsored by Council Member Areola.
This bill would require DOT to install, at the request of a child's parent or legal guardian, warning signs with plaques to warn a motorist.
of the presence of a child with autism.
Being an attentive and safe driver, cyclist, or pedestrian is extremely important for everyone sharing the street in any neighborhood.
We support the intent of protecting vulnerable road users, doing so is core to our agency's mission.
However, guided by the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, or MUTCD, we use signage carefully.
Both the manual and independent studies demonstrate that too many signs create visual clutter, which increases the chances that drivers will actually ignore signs with critical information.
It's also important to acknowledge that research shows that these specific types of signs don't make streets safer or change driver behavior.
Finally, the system proposed would require substantial new staffing and funding.
Without an effective removal process, we would be concerned to see these signs up on every block.
We're happy to have further discussions with the Council about this bill and our rigorous process for street safety design interventions.