De La Rosa demands data processing agreements be shared with Council
De La Rosa follows up on Hanif's questions, asking why data processing agreements are not shared publicly. Doyle says it is DOE policy not to post internal records. De La Rosa argues it is a choice and says the Council expects to receive the agreements, noting no NDAs prevent disclosure per earlier testimony.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councilmember.
One quick question for Mr.
Doyle.
I just wanted to clarify.
You said you don't, follow up on Councilmember Hanif's questions, you don't typically share the data processing agreement?
Yes, that's right.
Is that a...
You don't typically do it, you can't, or the DUE won't?
I think it's, as I understand it, DUE policy, we don't make publicly available or publicly post internal DUE records or DUE contracts.
But that's a policy that's a choice.
And so it would be a choice to share that information with the council, correct?
I would have to defer probably to our records access unit on that question.
They handle the disclosure of records.
I imagine it's okay because you didn't sign an NDA.
According to testimony, so I'm sure it's fine.
So I think we can expect at least the council to have those data processing agreements because this also came up, you know,
a lot of concerns about this particular program using CLAW, using other platforms to process its data, which leads to a whole other mess of issues.
So we look forward to seeing those agreements.
The council looks forward to seeing those agreements.
Councilmember Zhuang?