Cahill declines to quantify risk, offers follow-up
Menin asks Shane Cahill of Meta to quantify risk. Cahill says he doesn't have Meta's framework in front of him and offers to follow up, prompting Menin to call it troubling that companies can't quantify risk given the stakes.
And then I'm now going to turn to Mr.
Cahill for the response to that first question on quantifying the risk.
Speaker, thank you very much for the question.
First off, we're committed at Meta to building AI safely.
We have a multi-layered approach to this, where teams evaluate before deployment, including adversarial testing, applying safeguards, and deploying when only risks are mitigated.
We set this out in our public meta superintelligence scaling framework and our preparedness reports that go alongside the release of models.
So can you quantify what the risk is or you're not able to do that?
Speaker, I don't wish to be imprecise in relation to the question of quantifying.
I don't have our framework in front of me right now, but I'd be pleased to follow up with you afterwards.
Okay.
It's just...
Given the serious safety risks that have been raised here, to not be able to quantify what the risk is, is troubling at best.
I'm going to now move on lastly to Ms.
Friend.