Skip to content
Council Discourse

NYC Council meetings, chaptered and linked by time.

Independent project. Not affiliated with the New York City Council.

Created by Uzair Qadir

Inspired by Vikram Oberoi's City Meetings

Public Testimony

Alex Camarda of Reinvent Albany opposes Intros 561-A and 11

New York City Council · Oct 20, 2026 · starts 0:32:48 · 2 min 16 sec

Camarda says Reinvent Albany supports the Citizen Air Complaint Program as a creative enforcement tool. He opposes Intro 561-A because its exemptions would create loopholes and opposes Intro 11 because higher fines could increase delinquency and discourage complainants.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

Thank you, Chair Gennaro.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

My name is Alex Camarda.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

I'm a senior policy advisor for Reinvent Albany, a government watchdog group.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

Reinvent Albany supports the Civilians Air Complaint Program, believing it's a creative, innovative way to leverage civic-minded New Yorkers.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

To extend the compliance reach of the Department of Environmental Protection to enforce laws against idling.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

We're concerned by the bills before the committee today, in particular 561A and Intro 11, both of which we oppose.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

We oppose 561A because it creates numerous loopholes that will result in more idling, more air pollution, more asthma, and more related diseases like cancer and heart disease.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

These loopholes include diesel regeneration, enabling buses to idle anywhere along their routes, enabling buses to idle for 30 minutes without clear beginning and end points,

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

allowing vehicles to idle due to undefined mechanical problems, allowing vehicles that have auxiliary battery-powered units in good working condition, which is undefined, to also idle.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

More importantly, these loopholes will make it difficult for both complainants and the DEP to discern between an exception to the idling law and improper

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

Idling.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

DEP and complainants, I'm sorry, I already mentioned that.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

We also oppose intro number 11 because we think that increasing the fines is unnecessary.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

We think the current fine levels are changing behavior already, and idling has been greatly reduced in many neighborhoods across the city.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

We also think that it will increase delinquency on the part of respondents, the commercial vehicle companies.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

What we see for fines above $1,000 currently is that the delinquency rates are 60% or higher.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

So that will cause complainants to...

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

Not participate because they will not be paid their incentive because the companies won't be paying.

Member of the Public - Alex Camarda

Thank you.