Zhuang asks whether demolition permit is valid after court ruling
Zhuang says a judge denied developer Sandu access to a community member's backyard, questioning how DOB can uphold the demolition permit; Tigani says DOB will look into the court case and that missing egress or pedestrian safety conditions would impede the project and require a new solution.
And also, the judge also denied the developer, Sandu, suing one of the community members, have access of his backyard.
The judge already ruled out the case and then denied.
So they don't have the access.
How are you going to prove their demolition permit?
I'm not familiar.
We can look into the court case you're referencing, and if there is a condition that they needed to meet in order to have either
egress, pedestrian safety in place, and they don't have that, that would impede their ability to move forward and they would have to come back to us with a different solution.
So we'll just have to look into the question.
So as a result, the demolition itself, both what already occurred and what SEND wish to do in the future is illegal.
Should not approve, right?
Yes, if there is something improper or doesn't meet the code requirements or the legal requirements for moving forward,
many of the tools we talked about in the testimony and here at the hearing is what we use to put a project on hold, whether it's temporary or even longer.
But we can look into some of the issues you just raised, and we will get back to you on the floodplain question.
This week.