Skip to content
Council Discourse

NYC Council meetings, chaptered and linked by time.

Independent project. Not affiliated with the New York City Council.

Created by Uzair Qadir

Inspired by Vikram Oberoi's City Meetings

Public Testimony

Zach Steinberg of REBNY testifies on Intro 90 and Intro 874

New York City Council · Sep 16, 2026 · starts 1:46:37 · 1 min 44 sec

Zach Steinberg of the Real Estate Board of New York supports Intro 90's transparency provisions but opposes the mandatory lease extension, arguing it disrupts transactions and disadvantages new businesses. REBNY supports Intro 874's voluntary incentive model as a better approach.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Good afternoon, Chair Thomas Henry and Councilman Burr-Brewer.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

My name is Zach Steinberg, and I'm testifying on behalf of the Real Estate Board of New York.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the legislation before the committee today, and I'll focus my remarks on Intro 90 and Intro 874.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

New York's storefront market is healthy.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Small businesses are driving the recovery.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Mom-and-pop businesses are opening and expanding.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Availability is tightening in many corridors, and rents remain below previous highs.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

This progress reflects the reality that owners and tenants are not adversaries.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

They are partners and work together to ensure that successful storefronts continue to thrive.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Rebney supports aspects of Intro 90, as the bill would help small...

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

businesses enter lease negotiations with greater information and certainty.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Provisions we support include clear written leases, reasonable advance notice, accessible model documents, access to legal advice, and clear disclosures of property history.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

However, we have serious concerns with the provision that allows tenants to unilaterally extend their lease for up to one year when the parties cannot agree on a renewal.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Beyond property right concerns, this could disrupt transactions already underway and delay a new business that has signed a lease, invested in the space, hired employees, and planned around a firm opening date.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

It could also make owners more cautious to leasing to newer businesses.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

If owners can't rely on the agreed expiration date, they will have more reason to prioritize established, well-capitalized tenants over new restaurants, retailers, and first-time entrepreneurs.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

This would undermine the small businesses we are all trying to support.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

We believe Intro 874 is a better model.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

REBNY supports targeted city incentives that help legacy businesses remain in their communities when owners and tenants voluntarily reach long-term agreements.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

That approach incentivizes collaboration without mandating a particular lease outcome.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

We urge the Council to preserve Intro 90's transparency notice provisions, remove the mandatory extension, and advance practical voluntary tools like Intro 874 that help small businesses succeed.

Member of the Public - Zach Steinberg

Thank you.

Member of the Public - Amauris Gurujung

Thank you.