Morano asks about environmental review and sensitive resources
Morano asks whether environmental review identified impacts on wetlands, trees, open space, or drainage; Todorovic says no specific impacts were identified because DOS changes were on disturbed areas, and remaining DOS areas with sensitive features were kept.
Has the environmental review identified any potential impact on wetlands, trees, natural features, open space, drainage, or other environmentally sensitive resources?
And if so, what protections or mitigation measures are being required?
I don't know the specifics of the, I don't know any specific impacts that may have been identified.
There weren't any, I don't know any potential ones, but I will say that based on the methodology at a comprehensive level, there weren't any.
Any specific impacts because most of the DOS changes were already on disturbed areas, such as overtop building footprints.
Again, if a home was built in 1975 and DOS was on top of it, that doesn't really align.
So we removed it.
Any DOS area that does remain does have sensitive natural features.
So there may be some adjacencies or buffers, but we kept it in the places that do have wetlands, that do have trees.
So again, we could look to the specifics of the actual document, but the DOS was moved where it was on top of existing structures or on top of other structures such as we saw.
Some basketball courts, gazebos, and swimming pools in people's backyards.